Legislature(2023 - 2024)GRUENBERG 120
02/23/2024 01:30 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB265 | |
| HB107 | |
| HB265 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| *+ | HB 265 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 107 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 107-CRIMINAL LAW DEFINITIONS PERSON/LIFE
1:47:31 PM
CHAIR VANCE announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 107, "An Act relating to criminal law
definitions."
1:47:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KEVIN MCCABE, Alaska State Legislature, prime
sponsor of HB 107, introduced himself for the record.
1:48:16 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
1:49:01 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE presented HB 107, as the prime sponsor.
He paraphrased the sponsor statement [included in the committee
packet], which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
HB107 establishes legal definitions of "person" and
"life" in AS 11.81.900.
"Person" means a natural person or entity that has the
moral right of self-determination.
"Life" is defined as the property or quality that
distinguishes a living organism from a dead organism
or inanimate matter and that is manifested in the
function of a metabolism, growth, reproduction, a
response to stimuli, or adaption to the environment,
each of which originates within the organism.
The Alaska Constitution, in article I, section 1, says
all persons have a natural right to life. Thus, every
person's right to life must be protected by the State.
Article 1, section 3, further states that no person is
to be denied the enjoyment of any civil or political
right because of race, color, creed, sex, or national
origin. This is true regardless of age, level of
dependency, citizenship, or viability. And this
protection must not be denied to any human even the
pre-born. Further, a viability test to determine
whether a person's life is worthy of protection would
also be unlawful.
1:50:49 PM
JULIE MORRIS, Staff, Representative Kevin McCabe, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of Representative McCabe, prime sponsor
of HB 107, presented the sponsor statement [included in the
committee packet], which read as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
Section 1: Amends AS 11.81.900(b)(47) definition of
"person" to include an entity that has the moral right
of self-determination.
Section 2: Adds a definition of "life" to AS
11.81.900(b).
Section 3: Amends uncodified law of the State of
Alaska to add a new section outlining that the changes
made herein apply to offenses committed on or after
the effective date.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE, in closing, read three clauses from the
Alaska Constitution: Article 1, Section 1; Article 1, Section 3;
and [Article 1], Section 22. He said HB 107 would affirm the
principle established in Article 1, Section 3, by ensuring equal
protection for all individuals regardless of their stage of
development or characteristics.
1:53:24 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD considered a scenario in which a pregnant
woman was murdered. She asked whether the offender would be
held liable for killing the child, in addition to the mother.
1:53:48 PM
JOHN SKIDMORE, Deputy Attorney General, Criminal Division,
Alaska Department of Law (DOL), cited AS 11.41.150, which
indicates that someone can be held responsible for the death of
an unborn child, which is later defined in AS 11.81.900. In
this circumstance, the person who caused the death of the mother
would also be required to have the intent to kill the unborn
child or another person. Effectually, so long as the individual
was trying to kill either the unborn child or the mother, and
the unborn child died as a result, that person could be
prosecuted. In response to a follow up question, he defined
"unborn child" as "a member of the species Homo Sapiens, at any
stage of development, who is carried in the womb."
1:56:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER asked whether the bill sponsor was
concerned that the bill language referring to "an entity that
has a moral right of self-determination" could be extrapolated
to apply to non-human animals.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE acknowledged that the word "human" was
missing from the bill. He indicated that a forthcoming
amendment would be proposed to address the problem.
1:57:26 PM
MS. MORRIS stated that "human" would be inserted on page 1, line
8 after the words "distinguishes a."
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER pointed out that line 8 addressed the
definition of "life," whereas he was referring to the definition
of "person" on page 1, lines 4-5.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE opined that humans are better at defining
"death" than "life." He said the bill was his attempt at
defining "life" in statute.
1:59:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH asked whether a fetus would qualify as a
person.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE answered yes, "a developing person."
REPRESENTATIVE GROH asked whether there was any point in
pregnancy when a fetus would not qualify as a person.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE answered no.
REPRESENTATIVE GROH asked whether the bill would allow abortion
providers to be prosecuted for murder.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE shared his belief that for some medical
procedures, doctors are protected. He added that it was not the
intent of the bill to "send the storm troopers" into a doctor's
office for performing an abortion.
2:00:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH asked whether the bill could allow abortion
providers to be prosecuted for murder.
MR. SKIDMORE explained that the first section of the bill that
redefined a person as an entity with the moral right of self-
determination seemed broad. He shared his belief some case law
in Alaska might make the use of statute to punish someone for
engaging in an abortion unconstitutional. Ultimately, he said
yes, the bill would allow the state to file charges [for
providing an abortion]; however, he was unsure whether those
charges would be allowed to move forward through the court
system.
2:02:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH asked whether the criminal law is set up
with broad definitions or more specific definitions.
MR. SKIDMORE said most definitions within criminal law are meant
to provide guidance to practitioners, courts, and citizenry as a
whole. If a concept or definition is too broad, it can be
voided for "vagueness," because it does not provide adequate
notice to the general public about what is wrong.
REPRESENTATIVE GROH referenced an Alabama court decision about
the treatment of In vitro fertilization (IVF) under the law. He
asked whether the bill would have ramifications for families
trying to use assistive reproductive technologies.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE posited that the practice of IVF further
supports the notion that the preborn child is an independent
life, as evidence by the initiation of implantation into the
womb by an embryo. He remarked, "This underscores the passive
role of the mother's body."
2:05:18 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH asked whether healthcare providers would be
allowed to dispose of embryos following an IVF procedure if this
bill were to become law.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE said he was not equipped to answer that
question. He deferred to Mr. Skidmore.
REPRESENTATIVE GROH asked Mr. Skidmore how the bill would impact
families undergoing IVF.
2:06:18 PM
MR. SKIDMORE said he had not had a chance to consider those
concepts or think about how they might be applied.
2:07:03 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH asked whether a pregnant woman could seek an
abortion to access chemotherapy should the bill become law.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE pointed out that [medical] procedures
could be debated at length. In response to the question, he
answered no, the decision to "triage" between a woman and her
unborn child would be a medical decision between patient and
doctor.
2:09:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH directed the question to Mr. Skidmore.
MR. SKIDMORE reiterated that the law would allow charges to be
filed under the state, but the application of statute may or may
not be found constitutional given case law in Alaska regarding
the right to privacy and its interaction with healthcare
decisions.
2:11:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH asked whether surgery to address atopic
pregnancies would be criminal should the bill pass.
MR. SKIDMORE reiterated that the statutes would allow someone to
be charged; however, there are also defenses in statute allowing
an individual to engage in causing the death of another person
when its justified or in defense of someone's life.
2:14:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY pointed out that Representative McCabe had
described a women's body as "passive" during the process of
embryo implantation. He asked whether embryo implantation is an
example of the moral right of self-determination.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE responded that he was not equipped to
answer that question. He cited 150-year-old research that
determined that the embryo is separate from the mother's body
and contains separate DNA from the mother.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY pointed out that Representative McCabe was
referencing research from 1903, 1870, and 1868. He asked
whether cell division is an example of the moral right of self-
determination.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE said he did not consider cell division the
moral right of self-determination, but he did consider it life.
2:18:03 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY shared his understanding that the bill would
not change the practice of abortion in Alaska. He asked what
would change if the bill were to become law.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE said his intent was to define "life" in
statute.
2:19:03 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY sought to verify that should the bill pass,
there would be no changes to the legal system and no new crimes.
MR. SKIDMORE said DOL had provided an indeterminate fiscal note
due to the broadness of the term in Section 2. He said he would
need to see the forthcoming amendment to give a more definitive
answer.
2:20:45 PM
CHAIR VANCE announced that HB 107 would be held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 265 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM HJUD 2/23/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 265 |
| HB 265 - v.A.pdf |
HJUD 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM HJUD 2/23/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 265 |
| HB 265 - Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HJUD 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM HJUD 2/23/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 265 |
| HB 265 - PowerPoint Presentation.pdf |
HJUD 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM HJUD 2/23/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 265 |
| HB 265 - Child Rescue Coalition Backup Information.pdf |
HJUD 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM HJUD 2/23/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 265 |
| HB 265 - Letter of Support from ANDVSA.pdf |
HJUD 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM HJUD 2/23/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 265 |
| HB 265 - Letter of Support from Child Rescue Coalition.pdf |
HJUD 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM HJUD 2/23/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 265 |
| HB 265 - Alaska Watchman Supporting Doc.pdf |
HJUD 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM HJUD 2/23/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 265 |
| HB 265 - Letter of Support from CUSP.pdf |
HJUD 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM HJUD 2/23/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 265 |
| HB 265 - Fiscal Notes 1-4.pdf |
HJUD 2/19/2024 1:30:00 PM HJUD 2/23/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 265 |
| HB 107 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 2/23/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB 107 - v.B.pdf |
HJUD 2/23/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB 107 - Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HJUD 2/23/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB 107 - DOL-CrimDiv Fiscal Note (02-16-24).pdf |
HJUD 2/23/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 107 |